[Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography

Jordan, Lemuel CTR Lemuel.N.Jordan at uscg.mil
Mon Sep 21 15:18:57 EDT 2009



Will do, Andrea

-----Original Message-----
From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Gatta
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:16 PM
To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography

Well, I am schedule to take the exam middle of october. Just say a prayer for me will ya ;-)

Andrea


On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Holland, Brandon <hollandb at frmaint.com> wrote:


	Yes, dump that paragraph in the trash.  It's incorrect.  Download Clement's errata and it's listed in there.  I'm feeling good about not having read the official guide now.  I was seriously thinking about purchasing, but after reading the errata, I feel like it may actually hurt my chances by trying to read it last especially this close to wanting to take the test.  I'm going to skim through her chapters one more time, and take the book questions, and the cccure questions for that chapter only until I feel like I know the chapter and attempt it here very soon.
	

	-----Original Message-----
	From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Gatta
	
	Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:47 PM
	To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	
	Thanks Clement.
	
	Coming back to the my original post I guess that one way to look at availability in the context of cryptography is "as a ramification" as opposed as a service.
	
	At least I believe this is what the question I have mentioned in my post was trying to get out of the unlucky CISSP candidate.
	
	Anyway for completeness'sake here is what page 226 of the ISC2 official giude to CBK states:
	
	" Uses of cryptography
	
	Availability. Cryptography supports all three of the core principles of information security. Many access control systems use cryptography to limit access to systems through the use pf passwords. Many token-based authentication systems use cryptography cased hash algorithm to compute one-time passwords.Denying unauthorized access prevents an attacker from entering and damaging the system or network, thereby denying access to authorized access
	
	"
	
	Any additional thoughts ?
	
	Andrea
	
	
	On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Clement Dupuis <clement.dupuis at cccure.com> wrote:
	
	
	       WOW, what a fantastic thread.
	
	       Let's face it, the official ISC2 book has a LARGE number of errors throughout the book.  I am not talking about a few errors but dozens of errors.
	
	       The book was written by 13 different authors who have their own style of writing, they even contradict themselves like this thread about availability.   There are availability related to cryptography such as loosing your private key with no key escrow, however encryption does not address availability.
	
	       I have errata for the ISC2 book on CCCure.Org,   do a search for: errata using the search field at the top of the main page.
	
	       Do not take for granted that because it is the official book it is accurate.  So far it seems to be to the contrary.
	
	       I would use Shon's books as my main study tool and the official book only as a checklist and reference.
	
	       This is only my opinion
	
	       Do take care
	
	       Clement
	
	
	       Clément Dupuis, CD
	       CISSP, GCFW, GCIA, QEH, QSA, Security+, CEH, ECSA, LPT, CCSA, CCSE, MBNS, MBIS, MBHS,  ACE
	       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	       In real life:
	       Senior Security Specialist and Instructor
	       Security University
	       >>  Call me to get the best CISSP training  <<
	       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	       In Cyberspace:
	       President/Security Evangelist/Chief Learning Officer (CLO)
	       The CCCure Family of Portals
	       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	       Business:  407 479 3903
	       Fax:          407 264 8396
	
	       Maintainer of :
	       The CISSP and SSCP Open Study Guides Web Site
	       http://www.cccure.org
	
	       The Professional Security Testers Warehouse
	       http://www.professionalsecuritytesters.org
	
	       Knowledge sharing and giving back to the community
	
	
	
	       On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:02, Sergio Pantoja <spantoja at gmail.com> wrote:
	
	
	               IMHO, a exam may not lead to answer a question because they said so in a book, i hope the exam really test your experience in the field and your understanding of the security topics to help you have a broader/holistic approach.
	
	
	               On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:45 PM, () <rlhj71 at yahoo.com> wrote:
	
	
	On page 219 of the ISC2 book, it states that "The cryptography domain addresses the principles, means, and methods of disguising information to ensure its integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity. UNLIKE THE OTHER DOMAINS, CRYPTOGRAPHY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE STANDARD OF AVAILABILITY."
	
	--- On Mon, 9/21/09, cisspstudy-request at cccure.org <cisspstudy-request at cccure.org> wrote:
	
	
	
	       From: cisspstudy-request at cccure.org <cisspstudy-request at cccure.org>
	       Subject: cisspstudy Digest, Vol 15, Issue 29
	       To: cisspstudy at cccure.org
	       Date: Monday, September 21, 2009, 10:38 AM
	
	
	       Send cisspstudy mailing list submissions to
	
	           cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	
	           http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	       or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	
	           cisspstudy-request at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-request@cccure.org>
	

	       You can reach the person managing the list at
	
	           cisspstudy-owner at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-owner@cccure.org>
	

	       When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
	       than "Re: Contents of cisspstudy digest..."
	
	
	       Today's Topics:
	
	          1. Re: Databases and cryptography (Holland, Brandon)
	          2. Re: Databases and cryptography (Andrea Gatta)
	
	
	       ----------------------------------------------------------------------
	
	       Message: 1
	       Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:57:24 -0500
	
	       From: "Holland, Brandon" <hollandb at frmaint.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hollandb@frmaint.com> >
	       To: "The CISSP Study Mailing list" <cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	

	       Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	       Message-ID:
	
	           <58B3233454132D468C5F0D655003DA6411FDB100 at MAIL.frmaint.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=58B3233454132D468C5F0D655003DA6411FDB100@MAIL.frmaint.com> >
	
	       Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
	
	
	       You're right, I can't seem to find anything anywhere in there as well.
	       I have been studying Shon Harris mainly, but did study some SANS CISSP
	       course material as well.  I remember having a conversation about
	       cryptography and availability with a CISSP (we have multiple) at work.
	       The conclusion was confidentiality hinders availability... but that
	       must've been wrong.  (Or it definitely is for the test.)
	
	       It's plain as day in the official guide:
	       "Cryptography supports all three of the core principles of information
	       security."  The concept being by limiting access to only authorized
	       individuals you are somehow making the system more available since
	       unauthorized users can't get in to destroy the system.
	
	       I can see that to some extent... but do you REALLY have to be authorized
	       to break a system?  Does a DOS require successful authentication - not
	       normally.
	
	       I KNOW I read this somewhere with the opposite outcome as the answer but
	       not sure where it came from now.
	
	       At least all this talk about it will have me remembering this answer on
	       the test, even if I don't agree with it.
	
	       Thanks,
	       Brandon
	
	       -----Original Message-----
	
	       From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ] On Behalf Of Jordan, Lemuel CTR
	       Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:26 AM
	       To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	
	       I just scanned through chapter 8 of the Shon Harris Book, and did not
	       find
	       any discussion on "availability". Do you happen to remember which area
	       of
	       the book you saw this about cryptography hurting availability.
	
	       I plan to take the test in Nov or Dec, things like this make me worry
	       also.
	
	       Lem
	
	
	       -----Original Message-----
	
	       From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ]
	       On Behalf Of Holland, Brandon
	       Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:58 AM
	       To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	       That worries me.  I plan on taking the test Nov or Dec, and now am
	       wondering if I should effectively flush what I've learned from Shon
	       Harris and read the ISC2 Official guide for those crazy "just for the
	       test" answers like that.  I am too lazy to look right now, but am SURE
	       that the CISSP Shon Harris book I read says cryptography actually HURTS
	       availability... because u are specifically limiting availability by
	       obscuring the data.  It's like another "hoop" you have to go through
	       before having your data available.  And if you can't get through it,
	       your data is unavailable.
	
	       -----Original Message-----
	
	       From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ] On Behalf Of Andrea Gatta
	       Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 7:27 PM
	       To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	       Well, that is true. But just based on the fact that ISC2 looks very much
	       concerned about keys get lost/corrupted.
	
	       On the other hand the last answer - which is sadly the one I picked up -
	       looks quite reasonable.
	
	       As a note - looking at the crypto chapter in the ISC2 book it looks
	       pretty clear that they consider availability as one one of the security
	       services offered by cryptography (page 226). I am sure that availability
	       is not mentioned as a crypto sec service in any other book (but I will
	       look into it).
	
	       Andrea
	
	
	
	       On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Mike Archuleta <mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       wrote:
	
	
	           Well if you follow the chain of thought from the last question.
	       If a digruntled employee has access. YES
	
	           Sent from my iPhone
	
	           On Sep 19, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Andrea Gatta
	
	       <andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	
	               Another thing I have noticed with cryptography is that
	       ISC2 tends to riconduct all risks/downsides if cryptography not to
	       breach of disclosure as one would thing but instead to (again)
	       availability, this time in the technical sense (below one example but I
	       am sure I had others):
	
	               What is the primary risk of using cryptographic
	       protection for systems or data:
	
	               - loss of the system means loss of all data
	
	               - a hardware failure may lead to lost data or system
	       integrity
	
	               - a disgruntled user may lead to denial of service
	
	               - an employee may may hide is activities from the
	       security department
	
	               Obviously (now) the third aswer is the correct one
	
	               Andrea
	
	
	
	
	
	
	               On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Mike Archuleta <
	
	       <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	                   Oh yeah!!! The test really quizes you on subject
	       matter.  Even though I passed on the first try I wasn't entirely happy
	       with the experience.
	
	                   Sent from my iPhone
	
	                   On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Andrea Gatta <
	
	       <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	
	                       So I guess I should actually watch out
	       for these sort of questions in the real exam...
	
	                       Andrea
	
	
	                       On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Mike
	
	       Archuleta < <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	                           I remember this question.  It is
	       the most correct answer based on wording.  After realizing that answer
	       included placed with autorized users.
	
	                           I think I argued with myself for
	       five minutes.  Who places a database near authorized users? I put a
	       database in the data center with aal my servers and backup systems.
	
	                           Sent from my iPhone
	
	                           On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:19 PM,
	
	       Andrea Gatta < <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	
	       <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	
	                               Well, same here.
	
	                               Unfortunately the
	       question is from the official ISC2 guide, page 747  ;-)
	
	                               Point is, any chance
	       they got it wrong ?
	
	                               Andrea
	
	
	                               On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at
	
	       12:15 AM, Mike Archuleta < <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	       <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >  <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	                                   I would think
	       niether improve or reduce availability.  I don't think if crypto as an
	       availability feature.
	
	                                   Sent from my
	       iPhone
	
	
	                                   On Sep 19, 2009,
	
	       at 5:06 PM, Andrea Gatta < <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	       <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >  <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	
	       andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	
	
	
	                                       Hi
	       there,
	                                       I am
	       wondering if anyone could shed a light on the following question (and
	       answer):
	
	                                       In terms
	       of databases, cryptography can:
	
	                                       - only
	       restrict and reduce availability
	
	                                       -
	       improve availability by allowing data to be easily placed where
	       authorized users can access it
	
	                                       -
	       improve availability by increasing the granularity of the access
	       controls
	
	                                       -
	       neither reduce or improve availability
	
	
	                                       As far
	       as the author of the question is concerned the correct answer is:
	       "improve availability by allowing data to be easily placed where
	       authorized users can access it"
	
	                                       The only
	       reason I can think of for the answer to have a sense is that
	       cryptography protects a resource from unauthorized users access through
	       the mean of concealing its content.
	
	                                       With a
	       very long shot one could say that the resource would be "available" just
	       to authorizaed users. Which means that this question uses "availability"
	       in a very extensive - and I would add divious - way.
	
	                                       As far
	       as I am concerned encryption does provide confidentiality and integrity
	       as natural security services.
	
	                                       Thoughts
	       ?
	
	                                       Thanks
	                                       Andrea
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	
	       cisspstudy mailing list
	
	
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	                                   cisspstudy
	       mailing list
	
	
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	                               cisspstudy mailing list
	
	
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	                           cisspstudy mailing list
	
	                           <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	                       cisspstudy mailing list
	
	                       <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	                   _______________________________________________
	                   cisspstudy mailing list
	
	                   <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	

	       <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	               _______________________________________________
	               cisspstudy mailing list
	
	               cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	               http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	           _______________________________________________
	           cisspstudy mailing list
	
	           cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	           http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	       cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	       _______________________________________________
	       cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	       ------------------------------
	
	       Message: 2
	       Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:37:50 +0100
	
	       From: Andrea Gatta <andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	       To: The CISSP Study Mailing list <cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	

	       Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	
	       Message-ID:
	
	           <89ab1b610909210737l59ac1349g7f8b6bb6c6076429 at mail.gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=89ab1b610909210737l59ac1349g7f8b6bb6c6076429@mail.gmail.com> >
	
	       Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
	
	
	       The SANS material seems to be more "inline" with the ISC2 way of thinking.
	       At least SANS does mention where you need to just "swollow the peel" and
	       move on.
	
	       I have personally found a number of clear differences even when it comes to
	       things such as encryption methods, systems, types. I can't remember from the
	       top of my head but I bet I have found inconsistences between Shon Harris
	       book and the ISC2 guide.
	
	       The point is, Shon Harris is very good when it comes to drive the concept
	       home. Clearly the level of trickery of the CISSP exam - if it is true which
	       I don't know (yet) - might get in the way.
	
	       Andrea
	
	
	       On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Holland, Brandon <hollandb at frmaint.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hollandb@frmaint.com> >wrote:
	

	       > You're right, I can't seem to find anything anywhere in there as well.
	       > I have been studying Shon Harris mainly, but did study some SANS CISSP
	       > course material as well.  I remember having a conversation about
	       > cryptography and availability with a CISSP (we have multiple) at work.
	       > The conclusion was confidentiality hinders availability... but that
	       > must've been wrong.  (Or it definitely is for the test.)
	       >
	       > It's plain as day in the official guide:
	       > "Cryptography supports all three of the core principles of information
	       > security."  The concept being by limiting access to only authorized
	       > individuals you are somehow making the system more available since
	       > unauthorized users can't get in to destroy the system.
	       >
	       > I can see that to some extent... but do you REALLY have to be authorized
	       > to break a system?  Does a DOS require successful authentication - not
	       > normally.
	       >
	       > I KNOW I read this somewhere with the opposite outcome as the answer but
	       > not sure where it came from now.
	       >
	       > At least all this talk about it will have me remembering this answer on
	       > the test, even if I don't agree with it.
	       >
	       > Thanks,
	       > Brandon
	       >
	       > -----Original Message-----
	
	       > From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       > [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ] On Behalf Of Jordan, Lemuel CTR
	       > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:26 AM
	       > To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       > Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	       >
	       >
	       > I just scanned through chapter 8 of the Shon Harris Book, and did not
	       > find
	       > any discussion on "availability". Do you happen to remember which area
	       > of
	       > the book you saw this about cryptography hurting availability.
	       >
	       > I plan to take the test in Nov or Dec, things like this make me worry
	       > also.
	       >
	       > Lem
	       >
	       >
	       > -----Original Message-----
	
	       > From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       > [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ]
	       > On Behalf Of Holland, Brandon
	       > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:58 AM
	       > To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       > Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	       >
	       > That worries me.  I plan on taking the test Nov or Dec, and now am
	       > wondering if I should effectively flush what I've learned from Shon
	       > Harris and read the ISC2 Official guide for those crazy "just for the
	       > test" answers like that.  I am too lazy to look right now, but am SURE
	       > that the CISSP Shon Harris book I read says cryptography actually HURTS
	       > availability... because u are specifically limiting availability by
	       > obscuring the data.  It's like another "hoop" you have to go through
	       > before having your data available.  And if you can't get through it,
	       > your data is unavailable.
	       >
	       > -----Original Message-----
	
	       > From: cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org>
	       > [mailto:cisspstudy-bounces at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy-bounces@cccure.org> ] On Behalf Of Andrea Gatta
	       > Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 7:27 PM
	       > To: The CISSP Study Mailing list
	       > Subject: Re: [Cisspstudy] Databases and cryptography
	       >
	       > Well, that is true. But just based on the fact that ISC2 looks very much
	       > concerned about keys get lost/corrupted.
	       >
	       > On the other hand the last answer - which is sadly the one I picked up -
	       > looks quite reasonable.
	       >
	       > As a note - looking at the crypto chapter in the ISC2 book it looks
	       > pretty clear that they consider availability as one one of the security
	       > services offered by cryptography (page 226). I am sure that availability
	       > is not mentioned as a crypto sec service in any other book (but I will
	       > look into it).
	       >
	       > Andrea
	       >
	       >
	
	       > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Mike Archuleta <mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >        Well if you follow the chain of thought from the last question.
	       > If a digruntled employee has access. YES
	       >
	       >        Sent from my iPhone
	       >
	       >        On Sep 19, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Andrea Gatta
	
	       > <andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                Another thing I have noticed with cryptography is that
	       > ISC2 tends to riconduct all risks/downsides if cryptography not to
	       > breach of disclosure as one would thing but instead to (again)
	       > availability, this time in the technical sense (below one example but I
	       > am sure I had others):
	       >
	       >                What is the primary risk of using cryptographic
	       > protection for systems or data:
	       >
	       >                - loss of the system means loss of all data
	       >
	       >                - a hardware failure may lead to lost data or system
	       > integrity
	       >
	       >                - a disgruntled user may lead to denial of service
	       >
	       >                - an employee may may hide is activities from the
	       > security department
	       >
	       >                Obviously (now) the third aswer is the correct one
	       >
	       >                Andrea
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Mike Archuleta <
	
	       > <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >                        Oh yeah!!! The test really quizes you on subject
	       > matter.  Even though I passed on the first try I wasn't entirely happy
	       > with the experience.
	       >
	       >                        Sent from my iPhone
	       >
	       >                        On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Andrea Gatta <
	
	       > <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                                So I guess I should actually watch out
	       > for these sort of questions in the real exam...
	       >
	       >                                Andrea
	       >
	       >
	       >                                On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Mike
	
	       > Archuleta < <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       > <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >                                        I remember this question.  It is
	       > the most correct answer based on wording.  After realizing that answer
	       > included placed with autorized users.
	       >
	       >                                        I think I argued with myself for
	       > five minutes.  Who places a database near authorized users? I put a
	       > database in the data center with aal my servers and backup systems.
	       >
	       >                                        Sent from my iPhone
	       >
	       >                                        On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:19 PM,
	
	       > Andrea Gatta < <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	
	       > <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                Well, same here.
	       >
	       >                                                Unfortunately the
	       > question is from the official ISC2 guide, page 747  ;-)
	       >
	       >                                                Point is, any chance
	       > they got it wrong ?
	       >
	       >                                                Andrea
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at
	
	       > 12:15 AM, Mike Archuleta < <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	       > <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >  <mailto:mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> >
	
	       > mlarchuleta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mlarchuleta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                        I would think
	       > niether improve or reduce availability.  I don't think if crypto as an
	       > availability feature.
	       >
	       >                                                        Sent from my
	       > iPhone
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                        On Sep 19, 2009,
	
	       > at 5:06 PM, Andrea Gatta < <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	       > <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >  <mailto:andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> >
	
	       > andrea.gatta at gmail.com <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrea.gatta@gmail.com> > wrote:
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                                Hi
	       > there,
	       >                                                                I am
	       > wondering if anyone could shed a light on the following question (and
	       > answer):
	       >
	       >                                                                In terms
	       > of databases, cryptography can:
	       >
	       >                                                                - only
	       > restrict and reduce availability
	       >
	       >                                                                -
	       > improve availability by allowing data to be easily placed where
	       > authorized users can access it
	       >
	       >                                                                -
	       > improve availability by increasing the granularity of the access
	       > controls
	       >
	       >                                                                -
	       > neither reduce or improve availability
	       >
	       >
	       >                                                                As far
	       > as the author of the question is concerned the correct answer is:
	       > "improve availability by allowing data to be easily placed where
	       > authorized users can access it"
	       >
	       >                                                                The only
	       > reason I can think of for the answer to have a sense is that
	       > cryptography protects a resource from unauthorized users access through
	       > the mean of concealing its content.
	       >
	       >                                                                With a
	       > very long shot one could say that the resource would be "available" just
	       > to authorizaed users. Which means that this question uses "availability"
	       > in a very extensive - and I would add divious - way.
	       >
	       >                                                                As far
	       > as I am concerned encryption does provide confidentiality and integrity
	       > as natural security services.
	       >
	       >                                                                Thoughts
	       > ?
	       >
	       >                                                                Thanks
	       >                                                                Andrea
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       >
	       > cisspstudy mailing list
	       >
	
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       >                                                        cisspstudy
	       > mailing list
	       >
	
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       >                                                cisspstudy mailing list
	       >
	
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       >                                        cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       >                                        <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       >                                cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       >                                <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                        _______________________________________________
	       >                        cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       >                        <mailto:cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org> >
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >
	       > <http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org>
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >                _______________________________________________
	       >                cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       >                cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >                http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >        _______________________________________________
	       >        cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       >        cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       >        http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       > cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       > cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	       > _______________________________________________
	       > cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       > cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       > http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	       >
	
	       -------------- next part --------------
	       An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
	       URL: <http://cccure.org/pipermail/cisspstudy_cccure.org/attachments/20090921/8d56f200/attachment.html>
	
	       ------------------------------
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	       cisspstudy mailing list
	
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org <http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisspstudy@cccure.org>
	
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	       End of cisspstudy Digest, Vol 15, Issue 29
	       ******************************************
	
	
	
	
	                       _______________________________________________
	                       cisspstudy mailing list
	                       cisspstudy at cccure.org
	                       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	
	
	               --
	               Sergio Pantoja H.
	               spantoja at gmail.com
	               System, Network and Security Administrator
	               Linux User register #239475
	               Mandrake Club Member
	
	               _______________________________________________
	               cisspstudy mailing list
	               cisspstudy at cccure.org
	               http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	
	       _______________________________________________
	       cisspstudy mailing list
	       cisspstudy at cccure.org
	       http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	
	
	
	
	
	
	_______________________________________________
	cisspstudy mailing list
	cisspstudy at cccure.org
	http://cccure.org/mailman/listinfo/cisspstudy_cccure.org
	





More information about the CISSPstudy mailing list